THE LIPOPROTEINS
Introduction
The French physician-scientist Michel
Macheboeuf is acknowledged as the
father of plasma lipoproteins. His
seminal 1928 discovery fi ts the adage
that science usually precedes tech-
nology, in this case by several de-
cades. In his doctoral thesis, Recher-
ches sur les lipides, les stérols et les
protéides du sérum et du plasma san-
guinis, Macheboeuf described horse
serum lipoproteins, demonstrating
the association of lipids and proteins,
ìlipido-protéidiquesî, in plasma.1 It is
now recognized that plasma lipids
are transported by lipoproteins, which
are defi ned by the densities at which
they are isolated, that is, as the
high-, low-, intermediate-, and very-
low-density lipoproteins (HDLs, LDLs,
IDLs, and VLDLs, respectively); chy-
lomicrons, which are intestinally de-
rived, are composed mainly of dietary
lipids and small amounts of protein.
HDL appears in two subclasses, HDL2
and HDL3. Through a simple veni-
puncture, plasma lipoprotein levels,
which are arguably among the most
important risk factors for coronary
artery disease, provide clues about
the etiology of lipid disorders and
about their most prominent patho-
logic sequela, atherosclerosis. From
this window on life, a host of infor-
mative analyses has emerged. Corr-
elations between coronary artery
disease and the properties, composi-
tions, and plasma concentrations of
various analytes—lipids as well as
lipoproteins—have revealed mecha-
nisms that ultimately aided diagnosis
and provided new targets for pharma-
cologic management of dyslipidemia
and atherosclerosis.
LIPOPROTEIN PROPERTIES
The plasma lipoproteins are composed
of neutral lipids, polar lipids, and spe-
cialized proteins called apolipopro-
teins (apos). The major neutral lipids
are cholesteryl esters (CEs) and triglyc-
erides (TGs); the polar lipids are phos-
phatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, and
free cholesterol with small amounts of
phosphatidylethanolamine and traces
of other phospholipids (PLs). The com-
positions of the lipoproteins determine
their size and structures (Table 1-1).
Lipoprotein size and density are a di-
rect function of neutral lipid content,
with the largest lipoprotein particles
being the least dense and having the
highest ratio of neutral to polar lipids.
Surface charge as revealed by agarose
gel electrophoresis varies among lipo-
proteins according to the amount of
charged lipids and the conformations
of their apos. Lipoproteins have been
isolated according to size, charge, and
density by size exclusion chromatogra-
phy, ion exchange chromatography,
and ultracentrifugation, respectively,
with the latter technique being used for
preparative isolation.
The organization of the remainder of
this chapter proceeds from our view that
much of the currently unanswered lipid
and lipoprotein pathologies proceed from
dysregulated fatty acid metabolism,
which is important in numerous diseases
of public interest, including obesity,
diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Although many of the downstream effects of dysregulated fatty acid
metabolism are the targets of therapy, it remains important
to identify therapeutic modalities that might address un-
derlying causes.
Nonesterifi ed Fatty Acids
Some plasma nonesterifi ed fatty acids (NEFAs) are de-
rived from VLDL- and chylomicron-TG hydrolysis by li-
poprotein lipase (LPL), which is attached to the capillary
endothelium via proteoglycans. A small fraction of the
released NEFAs is released into the plasma, particularly
in the postprandial state, when rates of chylomicron-TG
hydrolysis are high. Most of the liberated NEFAs trans-
migrate the endothelium to adipose tissue (AT), where
they diffuse across the adipocyte plasma membrane and
esterify glycerol-3-phosphate via the Kennedy pathway
for glycerolipid synthesis. The TGs so formed associate
in TG droplets that are visible under light microscopy
(Fig. 1-1). The surfaces of the droplets are surrounded by
a mixed monomolecular layer of PLs and by specialized
proteins that are essential to normal TG storage and
hydrolysis, including perilipin, Comparative Gene
Identifi cation–58 (CGI–58), and microsomal transfer pro
tein (MTP)-B, a splicing variant of the canonical MTP-A
that is found in liver and is associated with protein disul-
fi de isomerase. Whereas MTB-B mediates fusion of small
fat droplets into larger ones,2 it has no direct effect on
lipolysis. In contrast, perilipin and CGI–58 are important
in the regulation of adipocyte lipolysis, and under fasting
conditions, AT TG is a major source of plasma NEFAs.
In the absence of stimulation, perilipin on the sur-
face of fat droplets blocks hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL)–mediated hydrolysis. With β-adrenergic recep-
tor activation, protein kinase A hyperphosphorylates
perilipin, thereby rapidly altering its conformation in a
way that exposes the TG to HSL. Ablation of the perili-
pin gene in mice is antiadipogenic and illustrates its
importance in energy distribution and storage.3 In the
absence of perilipin, β-oxidation is increased and he-
patic glucose production is reduced, whereas glucose
tolerance and peripheral tissue insulin resistance are
normal.4 According to gene array analyses, these effects
are associated with coordinated up-regulation of oxida-
tive pathways and down-regulation of lipid biosynthe-
sis.5 Adipose tissue expresses another lipase, AT TG
lipase,6 which is also associated with plasma NEFAs
and TGs in patients with type 2 diabetes.7 CGI-58, a
member of the subfamily hydrolase fold enzymes, acti-
vates (20-fold) adipose TG lipase, and variants of the
human CGI-58 are associated with Chanarin-Dorfman
syndrome, a disease characterized by ectopic fat depo-
sition.8 Like HSL, adipose TG lipase is essential to
normal lipid metabolism in adipocytes. The combined
activities of adipose TG lipase and HSL account for
more than 95% of the TG hydrolase activity present in
murine white AT. CGI-58 binds to perilipin A–coated
lipid droplets in a manner that is dependent on the
metabolic status of the adipocyte and the activity of
cAMP-dependent protein kinase.9
The Apolipoproteins
The distribution of the apos among plasma lipopro-
teins (see Table 1-1) determines some of their meta-
bolic effects. The apos, which can be classifi ed as
soluble and insoluble, are important directors of lipo-
protein metabolism. The soluble apos belong to the
same gene family in which the terminal exon IV
codes for the region of the apo that gives it its distin-
guishing biologic activities. All soluble apos are ex-
changeable and contain extended regions of am-
phipathic helices that mediate binding to lipid
surfaces. ApoA-I and apoC-I10,11 are activators of cho-
lesterol esterifi cation via lecithin:cholesterol acyl-
transferase (LCAT); apoC-II stimulates LPL-mediated
hydrolysis of chylomicrons and VLDL12,13; apoE is the
ligand for the cellular uptake of IDL and chylomicron
remnants.14–16 Mechanistic links between other apos
and lipid metabolism are more subtle but likely pres-
ent in ways that remain to be determined. Plasma
apoC-III correlates with plasma TG levels,17,18 whereas
apoA-V, which occurs at low levels in human plasma,
appears to be antilipemic.19 ApoB-100, an approxi-
mately 550-kDa nonexchangeable protein, is a major
protein of VLDL, IDL, and LDL, and it contains the
ligands for the cellular uptake of LDL via its receptor.
Chylomicrons contain a truncated form of apoB, that
is, apoB-48, which is a product of a novel mRNA edit-
ing mechanism wherein an amino acid codon is con-
verted to a stop codon, giving an expression product
that lacks the LDL receptor–binding domain.20,21
Lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] is another large lipoprotein, in
which the major protein, apo(a), associates with apoB
via a disulfi de bridge.22
LIPOPROTEIN PRODUCTION
Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins
The secreted lipoproteins VLDL and chylomicrons are
assembled and secreted by hepatocytes and enterocytes
in the liver and intestine, respectively. Their respective
assembly is driven by the TG synthesis from endoge-
nous and exogenous, that is, dietary, fatty acids. Thus,
an important determinant of fasting plasma TG concen-
tration is the plasma NEFA concentration that is avail-
able for hepatic uptake. Some of the NEFAs that are
liberated by the hydrolysis of chylomicrons following
an oral fat load are hepatically removed and used for
VLDL-TG production and secretion. Insulin resistance
in AT that impairs fatty acid storage also raises plasma
NEFAs, which are used for VLDL production. This
mechanism accounts in part for the association of dia-
betes and other insulin-resistant states with fasting
hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) and enhanced postpran-
dial lipemia. HTG is exacerbated by increased hepatic
lipase activity, which diverts TG-derived NEFAs to the
liver, where they cycle back to VLDL-TG. Although the
identifi cation of the mechanisms for protein folding is
usually diffi cult, identifi cation of the mechanism for
VLDL assembly, which involves protein folding and
the addition of specifi c amounts of polar and nonpolar
lipids, has been much more challenging. Nevertheless,
morphologic and subcellular fractionation studies of
hepatocytes23 have provided some support for a two-
step model of VLDL assembly. The fi rst step, partial
lipidation of apoB with TG, CE, and PL during its trans-
lation and translocation to the lumen of the rough en-
doplasmic reticulum by MTP-A, yields a pre-VLDL
that remains weakly associated with the endoplasmic
reticulum membrane. The pre-VLDL interacts with a
TG-rich particle from the smooth endoplasmic reticu-
lum. The molecular details for this step are not known
but may involve chaperones. In some hepatic cells,
inadequate lipidation leads to degradation of early
forms of VLDL via the ubiquitination-proteosome path-
way.24–26 Hepatic MTP-A is associated with protein di-
sulfi de isomerase, the endoplasmic reticulum retention
sequence of which keeps MTP within the endoplasmic
reticulum.27 Recent studies of a splicing variant of
MTP-B suggest that it is a fusogen2 and that in hepatic
cells it could mediate the fusion of pre-VLDL with TG-
rich particles. This remains to be demonstrated. Stud-
ies of chylomicron assembly have been sparse, but it is
presumed without much evidence to be similar to that
of VLDL. As discussed later, the HTG resulting from
insulin resistance in AT contributes to the complex
phenotype that presents in the metabolic syndrome
and obesity-linked diabetes.
Intermediate-Density Lipoproteins
and Low-Density Lipoproteins
Following their entry into the plasma compartment,
VLDLs are modifi ed by LPL. VLDL, which is the major
carrier of endogenous TG, contains apos B-100, E, C-I,
C-II, and C-III (see Table 1-1), which are segregated during lipolysis. Hahn fi rst reported that heparin administra-
tion released a factor that caused the clearing of human
plasma.28 This observation supported the extant view
that LPL associates with capillary proteoglycans and
that the main site for the uptake of the fatty acids re-
leased by LPL is peripheral tissues that are perfused via
the capillary bed. In a classic citation, Korn described
the properties of the clearing factor and determined that
it was a lipoprotein lipase.29 Havel and LaRosa further
established the importance of LPL in lipoprotein me-
tabolism by showing that LPL activity was stimulated
by apoC-II.30,31 Hydrolysis of TG by LPL converts VLDLs
to IDLs and chylomicrons to chylomicron remnants. As
expected, apoC-II and LPL defi ciency are associated
with severe HTG.32 Independent of mutations in apoC-II
and LPL, moderate HTG is associated with type 2 dia-
betes and atherosclerosis (see later discussion). Interest-
ingly, as VLDL is hydrolyzed by LPL, the C apos, in-
cluding apoC-II, transfer to HDL and lipolytic activity
via LPL is arrested, leaving IDL, which is not an LPL
substrate. However, in the liver, hepatic lipase, which
does not require apoC-II, continues the hydrolysis of
IDL to the mature apoB-100–containing product, LDL.
During this step, the particle loses most of its apoE.
Hepatic lipase remodels HDL through the hydrolysis of
PLs and TGs, an activity that is more profound in the
postprandial state.33
High-Density Lipoproteins
For a number of reasons, models for the structure, pro-
duction, remodeling, and catabolism of HDLs have been
more diffi cult to identify than those for the apoB-
containing lipoproteins. HDLs are small and hetero-
geneous with respect to size and composition (see
Table 1-1), so many conventional methods such as cryo-
electron microscopy, x-ray crystallography, and nuclear
magnetic resonance have limited value. Unlike the apoB-
containing lipoproteins, all the components of HDLs are
exchangeable. Thus, traditional kinetic methods cannot
be used to study their turnover. Lastly, although several
sources of HDL have been identifi ed on the basis of cell
studies, the quantitative importance of these sources in
human HDL metabolism is not known except in cases of
a natural ablation of a gene coding one of the proteins
that forms HDL.
There is evidence that some HDLs are secreted,
whereas others are a product of lipolysis in the plasma
compartment. The human hepatic cell line, HepG2,
secretes particles that have the properties of HDL and
contain its major apos.34,35 The perfusate from rat liver
contains small particles that have been described as
nascent HDL.36 Studies by Patsch and Tall have shown
that some HDL subclasses are formed by the lipolysis
of TG-rich lipoproteins.37,38 On the other hand, more
direct studies of HDL production by human hepato-
cytes are needed to better understand this important
process and its regulation. More recent studies have
focused on the role of HDL production and remodeling
in reverse cholesterol transport (RCT).
Unlike liver tissue, extrahepatic tissue can synthe-
size but cannot degrade cholesterol. Thus, cholesterol
accumulation in macrophages, a key cell type in ath-
erogenesis, produces a lipotoxic, pathologic state, un-
less there is a mechanism for its disposal; that mecha-
nism is RCT, and HDL is its central player.39,40 Within
the context of cardiovascular disease (CVD), RCT com-
prises three steps: cholesterol effl ux from monocyte-
derived macrophages within the arterial wall, esterifi -
cation and interaction with lipid transfer proteins in
the plasma compartment, and selective hepatic uptake
by HDL-CE by its receptor (Fig. 1-2). There are at least
four mechanisms for cholesterol effl ux:
• One mechanism is mediated by the microsolubiliza-
tion of membrane lipids by apoA-I via its interac-
tions with the ATP-binding cassette A1 (ABCA1)
transporter, which triggers unidirectional release of
cholesterol and PL, forming nascent HDL.41–43 Tang-
ier disease is a severe manifestation of an ABCA1
mutation in which plasma HDL-C levels are close to
nil and cellular transfer of cholesterol to lipid-free
apos is impaired.44,45
• ABCG1/G4 mediates effl ux to HDL2 and HDL3 but not
to lipid-free apoA-I.46–48 Effl ux increases with HDL-PL
content. ABCG1 is highly expressed in macrophages46–48
and might mediate effl ux from macrophage–foam
cells to HDL. ABCG1 might be the mechanistic link
between high HDL-C and low risk of CVD.
• A third mechanism is spontaneous cholesterol
desorption from the plasma membrane into the sur-
rounding aqueous phase, where it associates with
HDL. This process is driven by a cholesterol concen-
tration gradient from high (donor) to low (acceptor);
high relative levels of acceptor-sphingomyelin, which
is highly cholesterophilic, increase effl ux.49–51
FIGURE 1-2 Cholesterol transfers from macrophages to high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) via ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1), ABCG1/4, spontaneous
transfer, and Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) (1a–d), and is converted to
Cholesteryl ester (CE) via lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) (2). With further
cholesterol accretion and esterifi cation, HDL grows to its mature forms from which
lipids are removed by hepatic SR-BI receptors (3). •Hepatic Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI),
which selectively removes HDL-CE, HDL-TG,
and HDL-PL,52 also mediates cholesterol effl ux to
HDL, a process that is dose dependent with respect
to acceptor-PL content; acceptor-PL enrichment/
depletion increases/decreases effl ux via SR-BI; effl ux
is enhanced by addition of phosphatidylcholine53 and
by replacing acceptor-phosphatidylcholine with more
cholesterophilic PLs such as sphingomyelin.54–57
Lecithin:Cholesterol Acyltransferase
After cholesterol transfer to early forms of HDL, the par-
ticle undergoes a series of remodeling reactions involving
lipid transfer proteins and cholesterol esterifi cation. Al-
though Sperry identifi ed a plasma cholesterol-esterifying
activity in the 1930s,58 nearly three decades elapsed be-
fore studies of families with esterifi cation defi ciency re-
newed interest in this process because of the emerging
correlation between plasma cholesterol concentration
and CVD. Studies of LCAT, which catalyzes the transfer
of fatty acyl chains of phosphatidylcholine to choles-
terol, prompted Glomset to propose that HDL was the
vehicle for RCT, the transfer of cholesterol from periph-
eral tissue to the liver for disposal or recycling.59,60 LCAT
is central to RCT because it converts cholesterol to its
ester, which is not as readily transferred among mem-
branes and lipoproteins, and it converts HDL from a disc
to a sphere with a core containing mostly CEs. Additional
rounds of effl ux to HDL and esterifi cation produce the
mature form that is eventually removed by the liver. As
expected, patients with familial LCAT defi ciency have
very low plasma cholesteryl esters levels and an altered
lipoprotein profi le. The most profound effect of LCAT
defi ciency is corneal opacifi cation. In a milder form of
defi ciency—fi sh eye disease—corneal opacities occur
later in life and the reduction of plasma HDL-CE levels is
not as profound. In vitro expression of variants found in
LCAT defi ciency and fi sh eye disease has revealed that
the reduction in secretion and specifi c activity is more
severe in the former.61 Surprisingly, association of LCAT
defi ciency with CVD has not been fi rmly established,
perhaps because of the small number of patients, and the
studies of atherosclerosis in mice overexpressing LCAT
have been contradictory.62–66
Lipid Transfer Proteins
Human plasma contains two proteins—cholesteryl es-
ter transfer protein (CETP) and PL transfer protein
(PLTP)—that transfer lipids among lipoproteins. Among
the lipoproteins, the main donor–acceptor targets of
PLTP are HDLs, which PLTP remodels into large and
small particles with the concomitant dissociation of
lipid-free apoA-I from HDL.67 Studies in mice overex-
pressing PLTP suggest that PLTP is atherogenic because
it lowers plasma HDL levels.68 Indeed, some studies in
mice have shown that systemic PLTP expression cor-
relates positively with atherosclerotic lesion develop-
ment.69 Moreover, macrophage PLTP is an important
contributor to plasma PLTP activity, and its defi ciency
lowers lesion development in LDL receptor–knockout
mice on Western-type diet.70,71 However, similar
studies in LDL receptor–knockout mice suggest that
macrophage-derived PLTP is atheroprotective.72 These
fi ndings and the absence of natural PLTP mutants with
any associated pathology in humans make it diffi cult to
estimate the physiologic importance of PLTP.
In contrast, there is little ambiguity about the impor-
tance of CETP, and studies in humans with CETP defi -
ciency and in mice in which the CETP gene has been
inserted leave little doubt about its importance in lipid
metabolism. Current evidence, particularly in patients
with HTG, reveals CETP as an integrator of lipoprotein
remodeling that connects the metabolism of TG-rich
lipoproteins with those of HDL and LDL (Fig. 1-3).
Whereas PLTP transfers mainly PLs, CETP transfers
some PLs but has as its primary activity the exchange of
neutral lipids—CE and TG—between lipoproteins. In
normolipidemic subjects, CETP exchanges small
amounts of HDL-CE for VLDL-TG, thereby producing a
small increase in the TG content of HDL; effects on
VLDL are small. HTG profoundly alters the effects of
CETP on lipoprotein profi les, structure, and catabolism.
In the presence of HTG, the high VLDL levels provide a
large pool of TG for exchange with a much smaller pool
of HDL- and LDL-CE so that HDL and LDL are made
TG rich.73 According to cryoelectron microscopy,
enrichment of LDLs with TGs shifts their shape from
oval7 to spherical,74,75 reduces its binding to the fi bro-
blast LDL receptor, and lowers its stability as assessed
by enhanced PLTP-mediated release of apoA-I.76
The Special Role of Apolipoprotein A-I
in High-Density Lipoprotein Stability
and Metabolism
It has long been observed that HDL is much less stable
than other plasma lipoproteins. Early studies by Nichols77
showed that the chaotrope, guanidinium chloride, trig-
gered the release of apoA-I, but not apoA-II, TG-rich
from human HDL. More recently, Mehta and colleagues78
and Gursky79 showed that apoA-I in native HDL
FIGURE 1-3 Formation of small, triglyceride (TG)-rich high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
by the activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and hepatic lipase (HL).
A, Under normolipidemic conditions, HDL is formed via multiple cycles of phospholipid
(PL) and cholesterol effl ux via ABCA1 or ABCG1 followed by lecithin:cholesterol acyl-
transferase (LCAT)–mediated esterifi cation that leads to a mixture of HDL2 and HDL3;
B, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is formed via lipolysis of very-low-density lipoprotein
(VLDL) and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) by lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic
lipase (HL), during which the C and E apolipoproteins (apos) are transferred to HDL.
C, In hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), CETP mediates the net transfer of TGs from a large pool
of VLDLs to HDLs, giving TG-rich HDLs that are hydrolyzed to small, TG-rich HDLs (HDLs). resided in a kinetic trap and that, when a mechanism for
its release was provided, a large fraction of the apoA-I
transferred to the aqueous phase, with the concomitant
fusion of the remaining apoA-II–rich species into larger
particles. The fusion product is highly stable, and treat-
ment with guanidinium chloride does not release its
remaining complement of apoA-I.80 These studies fur-
ther showed that large HDLs, including HDL2, are more
stable than small HDLs and that apoA-I and apoA-II are
equally lipophilic with respect to large HDLs. Detergent
perturbation,81 LCAT,82 CETP,83 and especially PLTP76
and serum opacity factor from Streptococcus pyo-
genes84,85 also catalyze desorption of apoA-I from HDL.
This effect is particularly important in cellular choles-
terol effl ux via ABCA1, which requires lipid-free apoA-I,
and in the terminal RCT step, uptake of HDL lipids
without apoA-I (see later discussion). Thus, the HDL
instability fi rst observed and characterized by physico-
chemical perturbations is relevant to plasma and cellu-
lar activities that alter HDL compositions in vivo.
Metabolic Syndrome
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a dyslipidemic state that
is associated with a cluster of risk factors. As defi ned
by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult
Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III),86 a diagnosis of
metabolic syndrome can be made if three of fi ve
conditions are found. These are HTG, low plasma
HDL-C, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and a large waist
circumference. Many patients with MetS eventually
develop type 2 diabetes, with which it shares many
characteristics, including a link with obesity. There is
a growing opinion that MetS and diabetes might be bet-
ter viewed as a state of dysregulated lipid metabolism
with an attendant impaired rate of glucose disposal.87,88
The morphing of diabetes and/or MetS from glucocen-
tric to lipocentric has been driven by both clinical and
basic research and according to one model should in-
clude a cluster of abnormalities that goes beyond the
diagnostic criteria of NCEP ATP III (Table 1-2). As a
consequence, one can narrow the search for underlying
metabolic abnormalities to those that would give rise to
those shown in Table 1-2. It is crucial to acknowledge
that, in many cases, the abnormalities shown in Table 1-2 taken one at a time are not atherogenic, but
taken together produce an atherogenic profi le for which
current therapies are inadequate.
Thus, one should search for treatments that address
the underlying cause, thereby correcting the entire
MetS cluster of abnormalities. The clustering of some
of these abnormalities, for example, HTG and low
HDL-C, has long been noted,73 and it is of interest that the
main therapeutic effect of gemfi brozil, a TG-lowering
drug, is achieved through increased HDL-C concentra-
tions, an indirect effect that is likely mediated by
CETP.89 CVD is increased in Japanese-American men
with increased HDL levels because of a variant of
CETP that does not readily exchange HDL-CE for
VLDL-TG,90 further underscoring the importance of
treating the cluster of abnormalities and not just one of
its components.
Two lifestyle practices—alcohol consumption and
exercise—are widely viewed as cardioprotective.
Regular consumption of moderate amounts of alcohol
reduces CVD mortality,91 an effect that is likely medi-
ated by increased HDL-C and HDL-PL.92 This occurs
despite the well-known alcohol-induced inhibition
of chylomicron lipolysis that leads to enhanced post-
prandial lipemia. Exercise has broad effects that ad-
dress many of the abnormalities of MetS, including
the reduction of waist circumference through weight
loss. Vigorous aerobic exercise reduces plasma TG and
postprandial lipemia while raising plasma HDL-C,
especially the more cardioprotective fraction, HDL2.
93
Thus, the identity of the mechanism that raises
HDL-C concentrations may be more important to ath-
eroprotection than the plasma HDL-C concentration.
This view is supported by studies in mice showing
that increasing SR-BI expression lowers plasma
HDL-C levels while increasing RCT. Hepatic SR-BI
overexpression decreases plasma HDL-C,94–96 in-
creases HDL-CE clearance,95–97 and increases biliary
cholesterol and its transport into bile.94,97,98 Mice
with ablated or attenuated hepatic SR-BI expression
exhibit elevated plasma HDL-C and reduced selective
HDL-CE clearance.99
Anthropomorphic Determinants
of Metabolic Syndrome
Most of the MetS abnormalities shown in Table 1-2
have been cited as having a genetic component, and
searches for one or more underlying atherogenic
genes have been reported. On the other hand, one
could postulate, based on the number of analytes in-
volved (see Table 1-2), that MetS has a highly poly-
genic origin. A third hypothetical view, presented
here, is that one or perhaps a few master genes that
control NEFA metabolism give rise to the MetS phe-
notype. One of the abnormalities that could explain
the occurrence of the remainder of the abnormalities
is dysregulated NEFA metabolism in AT that induces
systemic hyperNEFAemia. Given that circulating
plasma NEFAs can rapidly enter and exit cells, plasma
hyperNEFAemia could be diagnostic for systemic hy-
perNEFAemia, in which all tissue sites are challenged
by a NEFA overload.
TABLE 1-2 Characteristics of the Metabolic Syndrome
High plasma NEFA Insulin resistance
Hypertriglyceridemia* Hyperinsulinemia
Profound postprandial lipemia Hyperglycemia*
Low HDL Pear–apple anthropomorphism*†
No HDL2 Low lipoprotein lipase
Small dense LDL High hepatic lipase
Elevated CET activity Hypertension*
*Metabolic syndrome according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult
Treatment Panel III.86
†Large waist circumference.
CET, cholesteryl ester transfer HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density
lipoprotein; NEFA, nonesterifi ed fatty acid. In liver, the hyperNEFAemia provides the substrate
needed for TG overproduction and VLDL hyperse-
cretion that leads to HTG.
• The increased pool of VLDL is a source of additional
TG that exchanges for LDL-CE and HDL-CE via
CETP, thereby lowering LDL cholesterol and HDL
cholesterol by reducing the CE content of LDL and
HDL and forming TG-rich LDL and HDL.73
• The TG-rich LDL and HDL are substrates for hepatic
lipase, which removes some of the TG via lipolysis,
leaving small dense LDL and the smaller, less athe-
roprotective HDL3 at the expense of HDL2; both LDL
and HDL are still relatively TG rich.
• Postprandial lipemia is more profound in MetS
because VLDL-TG is a competitive inhibitor for
chylomicron hydrolysis, and NEFAs are a product
inhibitor of LPL activity.
100
• In skeletal muscle, hyperNEFAemia is lipotoxic and
its presence is associated with increased myocyte TG
and reduced glucose disposal, which triggers insulin
secretion that gives rise to hyperinsulinemia.101,102
According to this model, interventions that would
address the entire MetS risk cluster would have to im-
prove fatty acid storage in AT. The pear-to-apple an-
thropomorphism that is associated with MetS and re-
vealed as increased waist circumference provides a
clue to underlying causes and possible therapies.
Although obesity is associated with diabetes, insulin
resistance, and CVD, this effect is depot specifi c.103–108
Early studies showed a higher risk of diabetes and CVD
in patients with upper body (truncal, central, abdo-
minal, or visceral) obesity than in those with lower
body (femoral-gluteal or noncentral) obesity.109–111
Waist-to-hip circumference ratio is associated with hy-
perinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 dia-
betes, and HTG112–116 and attendant CVD.117–122 In non-
diabetic, middle-aged men, subcutaneous abdominal
fat mass is a better predictor of insulin sensitivity than
intraperitoneal fat mass; the sum of truncal skinfold
thickness also better predicts insulin resistance than
intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, or peripheral subcuta-
neous fat.123 Importantly, posterior subcutaneous ab-
dominal fat mass better predicts insulin sensitivity
than anterior subcutaneous abdominal fat mass.125 De-
spite some evidence that central fat contains the under-
lying cause of MetS, there is other evidence that the
dysregulated energy metabolism and attendant lipoat-
rophy in noncentral fat depots, particularly the
femoral-gluteal depots, is mechanistically linked to the
MetS cluster (see Table 1-2).126–128 Thiazolidinediones,
which target peroxisome-proliferator activated recep-
tors, apparently work through depot-specifi c effects
that improve global insulin sensitivity despite weight
gain.129–132
High-Density Lipoprotein Therapy
Although the current RCT model is essentially a refi ne-
ment of that originally described by Glomset,60 new
transporters and receptors that participate in RCT have
been identifi ed. These include cholesterol effl ux via
spontaneous transfer or via ABCG1, which depends on
PLs. PLs are the essential cholesterophilic component
of all lipoproteins, including HDL, and increased
HDL-PC would be expected to increase cholesterol
effl ux in a way that is therapeutic.
• Reconstituted HDLs are highly cholesterophilic133–136
and superior LCAT substrates.137–139
• Reconstituted HDL infusion into healthy men in-
creases plasma PL and effl ux of tissue cholesterol to
small pre-β-HDL where it is esterifi ed.140
• Small pre-β-HDLs cross endothelium into tissue
fl uid, collect free cholesterol, and transfer it to the
liver, where it is converted to bile acids.141
•Infusion of a microemulsion of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-
phosphatidylcholine (POPC) and apoA-IMilano, that
is, reconstituted HDL–A-IMilano, produced lesion
regression.142
• Phospholipidated HDL is more cholesterophilic than
native HDL and a better cholesterol effl ux acceptor.53
• The reaction catalyzed by serum opacity factor has
some therapeutic promise; serum opacity factor
transfers the CE of 100,000 HDL particles to a single
particle that contains apoE while forming a PL-rich
neo-HDL.85 Hepatic clearance of the apoE-containing
particles via the LDL receptor could greatly enhance
RCT while the neo-HDLs, which are potential accep-
tors of macrophage cholesterol effl ux, could initiate
new RCT cycles.
Thus, discovery of new ways to increase plasma PL,
particularly HDL-PL, is a promising avenue and a chal-
lenge that would complement the effects of the statin
class of lipid-lowering drugs.
Acknowledgment
Henry J. Pownall is supported by grants-in-aid from the
National Institutes of Health (HL-30914 and HL-
56865)